热门搜索：

荷兰与贸发会议伙伴关系的独立评价（英）

商贸零售2024-05-01-联合国李***

AI智能总结

概要

该评估报告针对荷兰与联合国贸易和发展会议（UNCTAD）的合作伙伴关系进行独立评估。此评估覆盖了从2019年至2022年的四年合作周期，总预算为6百万美元。评估主要聚焦于经济发展的两个优先主题：1）可持续发展投资；3）私营部门发展的良好治理。报告目的旨在对项目结果负责，并促进学习。

评估发现：

相关性：

理论框架：项目与联合国发展结果链（DIAE）和联合国贸易和发展会议（UNCTAD）的使命目标相一致。
需求满足：合作伙伴关系资金满足了开发中国家的利益相关者需求。

一致性：

SDG：项目与联合国可持续发展目标（SDG）保持一致。
UNCTAD使命：与UNCTAD的使命保持一致。
荷兰政策：与荷兰外交部的可持续经济发展部门的政策目标保持一致。

有效性：

目标达成概述：项目在实现合作目标方面取得进展。
影响可能性与SDG贡献：项目有望产生影响并有助于实现SDG。
未预期效果：识别了一些未预见的影响。
经验教训与最佳实践：总结了项目中的经验和教训。

效率：

实施方式与内部监控：项目的实施方式及内部控制机制适宜。
资源使用：合理利用了UNCTAD内部资源。
外部合作：成功吸引国家和国际发展伙伴的外部合作。

可持续性：

成果持续性与活动扩展计划：项目成果具有持续性，计划扩大活动规模。
知识与能力建设：伙伴关系在知识和能力建设方面的持久性得到确认。

性别与人权：

性别主流化：项目注重性别平等。
公平发展与人权：强调了公平发展与保护人权的重要性。
数据细分：提供了性别细分的数据分析。

结论与建议：

评估报告总结了项目的关键发现，并提出了支持问责制和促进持续改进的建议。为了实现项目目标和促进未来合作的有效性，报告建议应着重于改进监测和评估机制、加强与利益相关者的沟通以及优化资源分配策略。此外，报告还强调了在性别平等、人权保障和能力提升方面继续努力的重要性。

UNITEDNATIONSCONFERENCEONTRADEANDDEVELOPMENT Independentevaluationof: Netherlands-UNCTADpartnership* IndependentEvaluationUnitMay2024 *ThisreportwascommissionedbyUNCTAD.TheopinionsexpressedinthisreportarethoseoftheexternalevaluatoranddonotrepresenttheviewsoftheUNCTADsecretariatoroftheorganizationsorinstitutionswithwhichtheevaluatormaybeconnected,ororganizationsorinstitutionsthatcommissionedthisevaluation.ThisevaluationreporthasbeenreproducedwithoutformaleditingbytheUNCTADsecretariat. ThisevaluationreportwaspreparedbyDrAchimEngelhardt,LotusM&EGroup,hereaftertheevaluator. IndependentProjectEvaluationsareusuallyconductedbyexternalevaluators.TheroleoftheIndependentEvaluationUnitoftheUnitedNationsConferenceonTradeandDevelopment(UNCTAD)inrelationtoindependentprojectevaluationsthatitmanagesisoneofqualityassuranceandsupportthroughouttheevaluationprocess,includingprovisionofnormativetools,guidelinesandtemplatestobeusedintheevaluationprocess,andclearanceofthefinalreport.ThisroleisbasedontheresponsibilityoftheEvaluationUnittorespondtothecommitmentoftheUnitedNationsEvaluationGroup(UNEG)inprofessionalizingtheevaluationfunctionandpromotingacultureofevaluationwithinUNCTADforthepurposesofaccountabilityandcontinuouslearningandimprovement.TheprinciplesunderpinningtheevaluationfunctionareenshrinedintheUNEGNormsandStandardsforevaluation. Inordertosupportatransparentandlearningenvironment,UNCTAD'sevaluationframeworkiscurrentlydefinedbyitsEvaluationPolicyasapprovedinJune2023. TheEvaluationUnitcanbecontactedat: UnitedNationsConferenceonTradeandDevelopmentPalaisdesNations,8-14, Av.delaPaix,1211Geneva10Switzerland Telephone:+41229171234Email:evaluation@unctad.org Website:https://unctad.org/about/accountability UNCTAD/OSG/MISC/2024/3 CONTENTS Page Executivesummary................................................................................................................ vi I.Introduction................................................................................................................... 1 1.1Projectbackground.................................................................................................... 1 1.2Evaluationpurposeandscope................................................................................... 4 1.3Evaluationmethodology........................................................................................... 6 1.4Limitations................................................................................................................ 7 II.Evaluationfindings....................................................................................................... 8 2.Relevance................................................................................................................... 8 2.1AlignmenttoDIAEresultschain–TheoryofChange............................................. 8 2.2PerceptionofpartnershipfundingmeetingDIAEanddevelopingcountries’stakeholderneeds .......................................................................................................................................9 2.3AlignmenttodonorTheoryofChange10 3.Coherence11 3.1AlignmenttoSDGs11 3.2AlignmenttoUNCTADmandate13 3.3AlignmenttoNetherlands-policymandate14 4.Effectiveness15 4.1Overviewofachievementofpartnershipobjectives15 4.1.1Howresultswereachieved19 4.2LikelihoodofimpactandcontributiontoSDGs21 4.3Unintendedeffects23 4.4Lessonslearnedandgoodpractices23 5.Efficiency25 5.1Adequacyofpartnershipimplementationmodalitiesandinternalmonitoringandcontrol25 5.1.1Enablingfactorsandchallengesforimplementation26 5.2UseofinternalUNCTADresourcesforpartnershipimplementation27 5.3Leverageofexternalcooperationfromnationalorinternationaldevelopmentpartners27 6.Sustainability29 6.1Sustainabilityofpartnership’sresultsandplansforscalingupofactivities29 6.2Sustainabilityoftheknowledgeandcapacitygainedinthepartnership31 7.Genderandhumanrights34 7.1Gendermainstreaming34 7.2Equitabledevelopmentandhumanrights35 7.3Disaggregationofdata36 III.Conclusionsandrecommendations37 Annexes I.Termsofreferencefortheevaluation46 II.Documentsreviewed55 III.Listofstakeholdersinterviewed56 IVDatacollectiontools57 VEvaluationmatrix62 VITheoryofChange:Netherland’sMinistryofForeignAffairsSustainableEconomicDevelopmentDepartment65 ACRONYMSANDABBREVIATIONS BITCOMESA BilateralInvestmentTreaty CommonMarketforEasternandSouthernAfrica COVID-19Coronavirusdisease DDEDIAE EconomicDevelopmentDepartmentDivisiononInvestment&Enterprise DTLDivisiononTechnologyandLogistics ECOWASEconomicCommunityofWestAfricanStates FDIGDP ForeignDirectInvestmentGrossDomesticProduct IDIdentityDocument ITInformationTechnology LDC m LeastDevelopedCountryMillion M&EMonitoringandevaluation MICMYPE nOECDRBM MiddleIncomeCountryMircoYPequenasEmpresasNumber OrganizationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopmentResults-basedManagement SDGSustainableDevelopmentGoals ToCToRUIUXWIFWIRWTO TheoryofChangeTermsofReferenceUserinterface Userexperience WorldInvestmentForumWorldInvestmentReportWorldTr

点击免费查看完整报告