热门搜索：

布基纳法索农牧业公共支出审查（英）

农林牧渔2024-04-01世界银行，

AI智能总结

The Burkinabé Agro-Silvo-Pastoral Sector Public Expenditure Review is a report prepared by the staff of the World Bank Group and external participants. The report provides an overview of public expenditure in the agro-silvo-pastoral sector in Burkina Faso, including an analysis of spending trends, areas of investment, and challenges faced by the sector. The report notes that the sector is a key driver of economic growth and development in the country, but faces significant challenges related to climate change, land degradation, and inadequate infrastructure. The report concludes that there is a need for increased investment in the sector to support sustainable agriculture, improve rural livelihoods, and promote food security.

BurkinaFaso FASO PublicDisclosureAuthorized PublicDisclosureAuthorized PublicDisclosureAuthorized PublicDisclosureAuthorized BURKINA Agro-Silvo-PastoralSectorPublicExpenditureReview JUNE2023 Agro-Silvo-PastoralSectorPublicExpenditureReview ©2023InternationalBankforReconstructionandDevelopment/TheWorldBank1818HStreetNW Washington,DC20433 Phone:202-473-1000 Website:www.worldbank.org ThisworkisaproductofthestaffoftheWorldBankGroupandexternalparticipants.Thefindings,interpretations,andconclusionsexpressedinthispublicationdonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsoftheWorldBank,theExecutiveDirectorsoftheWorldBank,orthegovernmentstheyrepresent.TheWorldBankGroupdoesnotguaranteetheaccuracy,reliability,orcompletenessofthecontentincludedinthiswork,ortheconclusionsorjudgmentsdescribedherein,andacceptsnoresponsibilityforanyomissionsorerrors(including,withoutlimitation,typographicalandtechnicalerrors)inthecontentwhatsoeverorforreliancethereon.Theboundaries,colors,denominations,andotherinformationshownonanymapinthisworkdonotimplyanyjudgmentonthepartoftheWorldBankGroupconcerningthelegalstatusofanyterritoryortheendorsementoracceptanceofsuchboundaries. NothinghereinshallconstituteorbeconstruedtobealimitationuponorwaiverofanyoftheprivilegesandimmunitiesoftheWorldBank,allofwhicharespecificallyreserved. RightsandPermissions Thecontentofthispublicationissubjecttocopyright.TheWorldBankGroupencouragesthedisseminationofitsworkandtherefore,thisworkmaybereproduced,inwholeorinpart,fornon-commercialpurposesaslongasfullattributiontothisworkisgiven. AllqueriesonrightsandlicensesshouldbeaddressedtoWorldBankPublications,TheWorldBankGroup,1818HStreetNW,Washington,DC20433,USA;fax:202-522-2625;email:pubrights@worldbank.org. Coverphoto:©OllivierGirard/CIFOR.Permissionobtainedfromthecopyrightholder.Additionalpermissionrequiredtore-useit. Coverpagegraphicdesign:WillKemp,GlobalCorporateSolutions,TheWorldBankGroup TableofContents AcknowledgmentsviiAcronymsandAbbreviationsixExecutiveSummaryxiiiIntroduction1MethodologicalAspects3 1.Political,Institutional,andSocio-EconomicContext5 2.LevelofPublicExpendituresonAgriculture9EvolutionofBudgetaryAllocationsfortheAgriculturalSector9TrendinPublicExpendituresonAgriculture10SourcesandMethodsforsecuringExternalFinancingforAgriculture11StatusofMaputoCommitmentImplementationandInternationalComparison13 3.EfficiencyofAgricultureAllocations15AnalysisofPublicExpendituresonAgricultureAccordingtotheirEconomicNature15FunctionalAnalysisofPublicExpendituresonAgriculture16 AnalysisoftheAllocationofDepreciationAllowancesbetween PublicandPrivateGoods24BreakdownofPEAbySub-sector25 4.TechnicalEfficiencyoftheProgramming,Execution,andMonitoring-EvaluationofPublicExpendituresonAgriculture29 StatusofImplementationoftheProgramBudgeting29EfficiencyofBudgetExecution31Coordination,Monitoring-Evaluation,CapitalizationandAppropriationofPublic ExpendituresonAgriculture38 5.Incidence,Impact,andSustainabilityofPublicExpendituresonAgriculture:FourCases-InputSubsidies,Irrigation,Agricultural Finance,andExpendituresallocatedtoForestry41AnalysisofInputSubsidies41Irrigation54AnalysisofAgriculturalFinancing74AnalysisofExpendituresAllocatedtoForestry86 Conclusion101 BibliographicReferences104 iv Boxes Box1:AgriculturalExtensionandAdvisorySupport18Box2:AgriculturalResearch21Box3:TheLivestockSubsector26Box4:TheFishingandAquacultureSubsector28Box5:EvaluationoftheImplementationofPNSRII35Box6:SummaryofFormerMechanismsCriteriaforTargetingBeneficiaries46Box7:PerformanceoftheDiPerimeter62Box8:PerformanceoftheBagréGrowthPole(2011–2020)63Box9:EnvironmentalInterventionFund(FIE)andForestFund(FF)95 Figures Figure1:EvolutionofBudgetForecasts(inbillionsofCFAFrancs)forMinistriesin ChargeofAgriculture9Figure2:ChangesinBudgetForecastsforInternalResources(inbillionsofCFAFrancs)10Figure3:EvolutionofPublicexpendituresonagricultureinnominalvalueandrealterms11 Figure4:EvolutionofPublicExpendituresonAgriculturebyFundingSources (inbillionsofCFAFrancs)12Figure5:MethodofFinancingAidtotheAgriculturalSector12Figure6:SourcesofFinancingAidtotheAgriculturalSectorforthe2016–2020period13Figure7:ShareofAgricultureinTotalPublicExpenditure14Figure8:BreakdownofPublicExpendituresonAgriculturebyEconomicUse16Figure9:FunctionalBreakdownofPublicExpenditureonAgricultureoverthe2016–2020period17Figure10:RateofSupporttoAgriculturalProducers20 Figure11:TotalExpenditureAllocatedtoAgriculturalResearchbyTypeofFundingin billionsofCFAFrancs22Figure12:BreakdownofExpendituresbyNatureofGoods25Figure13:BreakdownofPEAbySub-Sector,Average2016–202025 Figure14:Shareofcreditsdelegatedtodecentralizedservicestocoveroperating expensesoverthe2017–2020period30Figure15:BudgetExecutionRateofBudgetsBasedonInternalResources32Figure16:BudgetExecutionRateofInvestmentsonExternalResources33Figure17:Changeinsubsidizedquantitiesandtherateofcoverageofmineralfertilizerneeds44 Figure18:ComparisonBetweentheCalculatedReferencePriceandtheState’s PurchasePriceofUrea49Figure19:BudgetsandExpendituresAllocatedtoHAFs,inbillionsofCFAFr

点击免费查看完整报告

你可能感兴趣

布基纳法索农牧业公共支出审查（英）

你可能感兴趣

乌兹别克斯坦公共支出审查，2022年12月：人力资本和水基础设施更物有所值（英）

中非共和国主要人类发展部门的公共支出审查（英）

洪都拉斯公共支出审查：加强财政韧性（英）

菲律宾农业公共支出审查：特别关注Mandanas裁决对农业食品系统的影响（英）

中非共和国主要人类发展部门的公共支出审查：摘要（英）