BISWorkingPapers No1176 TheeffectofCovidpensionwithdrawalsandtheUniversalGuaranteedPensionontheincomeoffutureretireesinChile byCarlosMadeira MonetaryandEconomicDepartment March2024 JELclassification:D14,H55,O54 Keywords:Pensionwealth,Covidpandemic,Fiscalcosts BISWorkingPapersarewrittenbymembersoftheMonetaryandEconomicDepartmentoftheBankforInternationalSettlements,andfromtimetotimebyothereconomists,andarepublishedbytheBank.Thepapersareonsubjectsoftopicalinterestandaretechnicalincharacter.TheviewsexpressedinthemarethoseoftheirauthorsandnotnecessarilytheviewsoftheBIS. ThispublicationisavailableontheBISwebsite(www.bis.org). ©BankforInternationalSettlements2024.Allrightsreserved.Briefexcerptsmaybereproducedortranslatedprovidedthesourceisstated. ISSN1020-0959(print) ISSN1682-7678(online) TheeffectofCovidpensionwithdrawalsandtheUniversalGuaranteedPensionontheincomeoffutureretireesinChile CarlosMadeira×December2023 Abstract ChileimplementedlargepensionwithdrawalsduringtheCovidpandemic.Afterwards,Chileincreasednon-contributorybenefitsinaquasi-universalscheme.Simulatingfuturepensions,Ishowthattheaveragelossincontributorypensionincomeis27.9%,withlossesof23.9%and31.4%formenandwomen,respectively.Afteraccountingforpublictransfers,theaveragelossintotalpensionincomeisjust6.2%,withlossesof7.5%and5.2%formenandwomen,respectively.Currentretireeslostjust1.1%oftheirpensionincomeafteraccountingforthegovernmenttransfers.Thestatemayendupcovering92%ofthetotalvalueofthepensionwithdrawalsthroughincreasedtransfers. JELClassification:D14;H55;O54. Keywords:Pensionwealth;Covidpandemic;Fiscalcosts.Declarationsofinterest:none. ×BankforInternationalSettlements(BIS)andCentralBankofChile,carlos.madeira@bis.org.TheviewsandconclusionspresentedinthispaperareexclusivelythoseoftheauthoranddonotnecessarilyreflectthepositionoftheBISortheCentralBankofChile.Allerrorsaremyown. 1Introduction DuringtheCovidpandemic,atleast31countriesallowedsomepensionwithdrawalsasameasuretosupportdistressedhouseholds(OECD2021,Madeira2022a,Cespedesetal2023).Chilewasamongthefewcountriesforwhichthepensionwithdrawalsduringthepandemiccouldbemadewithoutanyconditionsorurgencyrequirements.However,despiteothergovernmenttransferstopoorhouseholdsandjobretentionprograms(Madeira2022b),theChileanpensionwithdrawalsintermsofthepre-pandemicGDPweretwiceaslargeasthoseofanyothercountry(OECD2021).TheChileanwithdrawalsrepresentedatotalrundowninpensionassetsofaround20%ofGDPandreducedthecontributorypensionsofalmost11millionworkers(EvansandPienknagura2021,Fuentesetal.2021,Fuentesetal.2023).Therefore,theeconomicimplicationsoftheChileanwithdrawalsaresignificantforfutureretirees.Thecurrentlowlevelofcontributorypensionsavingsmayincreasethedemandsforpensionreform(EvansandPienknagura2021,Parada-Contzen2022,Madeira2022a),whilereducingdomesticsavingsandinvestment(Cerdaetal.2020,Parada-Contzen2020,Madeira2022a). UsingthemostrecentChileanHouseholdExpenditureSurvey(EncuestadePresupuestosFamiliares, EPF)of2017withasampleof15,239households,IestimatetheimpactofthepensionwithdrawalsinChileonthefuturepensionincomeofretireesandtheeffectsofthenewpensionreformlegislatedin2022.Projectionofworkers'laborpathuntilretirementagewithaccumulatedpensioncontributions,forthetwocounterfactualswiththepensionwithdrawalsandwithoutthese,allowmetocomparethelossinfuturepensionincomerelativetotheforecastedno-withdrawalspension.Ishowthattheeffectofthewithdrawalsonthecontributorycomponentofthepensionincomeislargeandwillpersistoverseveralyears.However,therewasalargeexpansionofthepublicnon-contributorypensionsinChilewithnewlegislationin2022,entitledthe"UniversalGuaranteedPension"law(law21419oftheChileanCongress).Afterthis2022law,theeffectofthewithdrawalsissubstantiallyreducedoncethetotalpensionincome(thatis,contributoryandnon-contributorypensions)isaccountedfor.Finally,Ianalyzethefiscalcostsofhighergovernmenttransferstoboththecurrentandfutureretirees(i.e.,thosecurrentlyinthelaborforcepopulation)asaresultofthepensionwithdrawals. Thisstudyisthefirsttoshowtheimplicationsforthepensionincomeofthecurrentandfuture cohortsofretireesinChileofthepensionpolicychoicestakenoverthelast3years.Notethatthesewerepolicydecisionswithatrulylargesizeattheinternationallevel.During2020and2021,Chileallowedthesocialsecurityaffiliatestowithdrawalmost20%ofGDPfromtheirprivatepensionaccountsasoneofthepandemicsupportmeasures(besidesotherfiscalmeasures,seeMadeira2022b,2023).Then,in2022,theChileangovernmentannouncedanewsetofpubliclyprovidedpensionbenefitsthatalsohadlargefiscalimplicationsforitsfuture.Theanalysisinthisarticleshowsthatthe2022pensionpolicyreformalmostentirelycorrectedthenegativeconsequencesofthepandemicmeasuresforthefutureretirementincome,butatthecostofaddingafuturefiscalburdenequivalentto92%ofthewithdrawals.Thissetofpolicydecisionsisthereforeverysignificantandprovidesapolicyexperiencethatisrarelyundertakenwithsuchasize. PreviousresearchontheChileanpensionwithdrawalshassummarizedthepoliticalattitudesanddemographiccharacteristicsofthepersonspreferringearly