2022 大湾区指数发布 GBAINDEXPRESSCONFERENCE 中国城市规划设计研究院 粤港澳大湾区 高质量发展指数 High-QualityDevelopmentIndexoftheGreaterBayArea 巨型都市网络:粤港澳大湾区的空间特质与内在机制 深圳分院 中国城市规划设计研究院深圳分院 AMega-CityNetwork:SpatialCharacteristicsandIntrinsicMechanismsoftheGreaterBayArea 2022/09 中国城市规划设计研究院深圳分院 CHINAACADEMYOFURBANPLANNING&DESIGNSHENZHEN 中国城市规划设计研究院粤港澳研究中心 GD-HK-MORESEARCHCENTER,CHINAACADEMYOFURBANPLANNING&DESIGN 前言PREFACE 2022年,伴随新冠疫情的反复与俄乌冲突的发生,打断了经济复苏的节奏,阻断了全球供应链,加剧了世界政治经济格局的动荡与重塑,这也使得我国外部发展环境环境进一步恶化,经济发展面临更多不确定性。 在此背景下,中国更需要坚定不移地走高质量发展道路,粤港澳大湾区更需要坚定不移的建设世界级城市群,快速提升全球核心竞争力,摆脱全球供应链中短板因素的制约,完善内部产业链,强化区域发展韧性,逐步实现区域的相对均衡发展与共同富裕。 中国城市规划设计研究院 大湾区高质量发展指数核心在于从城市群空间结构视角探索高质量发展路径,通过大数据动态跟踪高质量发展要素的集聚与扩散状态,判断其空间演化特征与趋势。2021年大湾区高质量发展指数发布基于大湾区作为巨型城市区域的独特性的认识,提出巨型都市网络概念。2022年发布重点从影响空间结构的两种趋势,即都市圈与网络化,以及形成“三体”的三种制度逻辑,催生网络化的六种机制对其空间特征与形成机制深入分析,以发现影响其结构演化、支撑其高质量发展、参与全球专业化分工及世界级城市群建设的战略性节点。 In2022,theworldpoliticalandeconomiclandscapeisgoingthroughevengreaterturbulenceandtransformation,exacerbatedbyconstantinterruptionstoeconomicrecoveryduetorecurrentoutbreaksofCOVID-19andfurtherdisruptionstotheglobalsupplychaintriggeredbytheRussia-Ukraineconflicts.IthasresultedinfurtherdeteriorationofexternalenvironmentforChina,accompaniedbygreateruncertaintiesineconomicdevelopment. 深圳分院 Giventhiscontext,Chinaneedstocommittothepathofhigh-qualitydevelopmentinanunwaveringmannermorethanever.TheGreaterBayAreaalsoneedstoremainsteadfastinbuildingaworld-classcitycluster,soastoenhanceitsglobalcorecompetitivenessandbreakawayfromtheconstraintsofweaklinksintheglobalsupplychainbroughtbytheinternationalenvironment.Itinvolveseffortstoimproveitsinternalindustrialchainandresilienceofregionaldevelopment,inordertograduallyachieverelativelybalanceddevelopmentandcommonprosperitywithintheregion. TheHigh-QualityDevelopmentIndexoftheGreaterBayAreaisessentiallyanexplorationofpathforhigh-qualitydevelopmentwiththeperspectiveofspatialstructureforurbanclusters.Itdynamicallykeepstrackoftheaggregationanddispersionofhigh-qualitydevelopmentfactorswithbigdata,inordertoidentifyitsfeaturesandtrendsofspatialevolution.TheIndexreleasedin2021wasgroundedintheuniquenessoftheGreaterBayAreaasamega-cityregion,thusproposingtheconceptofmega-citynetwork.The2022Indexfocusesonmetropolitanareasandnetwork-basedevolution,thetwotrendsthathaveanimpactonthespatialstructure.Italsodelvesintothethreetypesofinstitutionallogicbehindtheformationofthreebodiesandsixmechanismsthatfacilitatenetwork-basedchanges.Suchanin-depthanalysisofspatialcharacteristicsandintrinsicmechanismswillallowforidentificationofstrategicjuncturesthathaveanimpactonitsstructuralevolution,underpinitshigh-qualitydevelopmentandparticipateinspecializeddivisionoflaborgloballyandthedevelopmentofworld-classcityclusters. 目录CONTENTS 两种趋势:都市圈与网络化 1TWOTRENDS:METROPOLITANAREASANDNETWORK-BASEDEVOLUTION 三体引擎:增长的制度逻辑 2THETHREE-BODYENGINE:INSTITUTIONALLOGICOFGROWTH 六维协同:网络的形成机制 3SIX-DIMENSIONALSYNERGY:THEFORMATIONMECHANISMOFNETWORK 中国城市规划设计研究院深圳分院 中国城市规划设计研究院深圳分院 独特现象:巨型都市网络 4THEUNIQUEMEGA-CITYNETWORK 动态更新:核心技术迭代 5DYNAMICUPDATE:CORETECHNOLOGYITERATION page04 page11 page14 page35 page38 042022粤港澳大湾区高质量发展指数2022High-QualityDevelopmentIndexoftheGuangdong-HongKong-MacaoGreaterBayArea05 两种趋势:都市圈与网络化 TwoTrends:MetropolitanAreasandNetwork-BasedEvolution 巨型城市区域所表现的多中心、网络化、功能性三大特征,更多的是从流动空间的视角考虑其网络化的发展过程,但大湾区作为典型的巨型城市区域,同时还受到都市圈演化趋势的影响。三大中心城市在集聚与扩散过程中不断推动中心与腹地的关系变化,从而使其网络化的演绎过程更为复杂。 Polycentric,network-basedandfunctionalfeaturesarethreemajorcharacteristicsofmega-cityregions,takingintoaccounttheflowingspaceperspectivetoconsidertheprocessofitsnetwork-basedevolution.Butasatypicalregionofmegacities,theGreaterBayAreaisalsoundertheevolutionaryinfluenceofmetropolitanareas.Theaggregationanddispersionofthreecorecitiesareconstantlynurturingchangingdynamicsbetweencorecitiesandtheirheartland,resultinginevengreatercomplexityinitsnetwork-basedevolutionaryprocess. 贸、行政、文化中心引导的圈层格局;香港的核心圈层则依托深港过境口岸有一定范围延展,并在自贸区战略下与南沙、横琴有密切联系,紧密圈层则主要反映了粤港合作的主要空间载体,包括广州、佛山、东莞的部分合作平台,并体现了“北往南来”人群居住、工作和休闲的主要场所。 职能互补、空间邻近与制度差异,是三大城市腹地叠加的主要成因。三大中心城市职能、制度差 JiangmenandZhongshanandgivingrisetoalayoutoflayeredcirclesguidedbytrade,administrativeandculturalcenters;ThecorecircleofHongKongextendsbeyondthescopeofcross-borderportsbetweenShenzhenandHongKong,stayinginclosecontactwithNanshaandHengqinunderthefreetradezonestrategy.Itsclosely-connectedcirclemainlyaccommodatesthespaceforHongKong-Guangdongcooperation,includingcooperationplatformsbasedinGuangzhou,FoshanandDongguan.Italsoembodiesmainvenuesforcommutersalongthenorth-southaxistolive,workandrelax. Functionalcomplementarity,spatialproximityandinstitutionaldiversityarethemainreasonsbehindtheoverlappingheartlandofthethreecities. 大湾区的都市圈趋势:三大中心城市共享湾区腹地 TrendofMetropolitanAreasintheGreaterBayArea:SharedHeartlandamongThreeCoreCities 异显著,形成高度密切、协同的合作关系,且空间距离高度邻近,广深中心区距离约120km,深港中心区距离约50km,均未超过一般都市圈 Eachwiththeirowndistinctivefunctionsandinstitutions,thethreecorecitieshaveformulatedclosetieswithwell-coordinatedcooperation.Thespatialproximityisals