Queer Perspectives on Public Space

Queer Perspectives on Public Space: An Inclusive Approach

Introduction

• Objective: Address the lack of data on LGBTQIA+ experiences in public spaces by exploring perceptions of safety, comfort, and inclusion.

Demographics

• Respondent Composition:
  • Gender: Balanced between men (44%) and women (42%), with 14% identifying as non-binary or gender fluid.
  • Sexual Orientation: Largest group (46%) identified as 'gay or lesbian'.
  • Age: Over 80% of respondents identified as LGBTQIA+, with specific insights into transgender (12%), intersex (2%), and bisexual/pansexual populations.
  • Geographical Representation: 70% of responses came from the UK, potentially limiting generalizability to non-western cultures.

Section 1: The Big Picture

• Key Findings:
  • General Themes: Features like security, comfort, and diverse representation significantly contribute to feelings of inclusion.
  • Exploratory Themes: Revealed nuanced experiences highlighting the complexities of LGBTQIA+ interactions in public spaces, indicating no single design approach fits all.

Section 2: General Themes

• Inclusion: Highlighted the importance of features that foster a sense of welcome and belonging.

Section 3: Exploratory Themes

• Security Paradox: Contradictory feelings about safety, often influenced by personal experiences and cultural context.
• Health, Comfort, and Ambience: Importance of physical comfort and aesthetic appeal in enhancing inclusivity.
• Seeing Our Diverse Selves: Need for representation that acknowledges and celebrates diversity.
• Designing Against Monoculture: Advocates for designs that avoid uniformity, embracing a range of identities and experiences.
• Authority of Space: Discussion on power dynamics and control in public spaces, affecting LGBTQIA+ experiences.

Section 4: 360° Environments

• Case Studies: Detailed analysis of various public spaces (bus stations, parks, gay neighborhoods, hospitals, residential streets, commercial areas) showcasing inclusive design principles.

Section 5: Limitations & Next Steps

• Data Limitations: Acknowledges challenges in accurately representing all LGBTQIA+ subgroups, particularly intersex and asexual individuals.

Section 6: Call to Action

• Engagement: Encourages deeper engagement with the LGBTQIA+ community to refine and implement inclusive design practices.

Methodology

• Co-creation: Developed with input from LGBTQIA+ participants and experts.
• Survey: Distributed globally through networks, partnerships, and community outreach.
• Analysis: Mixed-mode approach combining quantitative data analysis and qualitative coding.

Conclusion

The study underscores the multifaceted nature of LGBTQIA+ experiences in public spaces, emphasizing the need for tailored, inclusive design strategies that account for the diversity within the community. By focusing on key themes like security, comfort, and representation, the report provides a foundation for creating more welcoming and accessible public environments for all.