热门搜索：

Jankovic

文化传媒2023-10-24FIFA李***

AI智能总结

The Players' Status Chamber of the Serbian Football Association (FPSD) passed a decision on October 24, 2023, regarding an employment-related dispute between the coach Vladimir Janković and the Lithuanian club FK Riteriai. The dispute arose from a contract signed between the two parties on March 29, 2023, which was valid until November 15, 2023. The contract included monthly salary, rental allowance, and an official match winning bonus. On July 21, 2023, the Respondent prohibited the Claimant from attending training sessions and continuing his coaching activity until July 23, 2023. On July 24, 2023, the Respondent sent a second correspondence to the Claimant requesting an explanation for an alleged violation of employment duties. The Claimant responded the same day, stating that the accusations of "psychological compulsion and unethical behavior" were unfounded.

Decisionofthe Players’StatusChamber passedon24October2023 regardinganemployment-relateddisputeconcerningthecoachVladimirJanković BY: LouisEverard(theNetherlands) CLAIMANT: MrVladimirJanković RepresentedbyKasaloRaić RESPONDENT: FKRiteriai,Lithuania I.Factsofthecase 1.On29March2023,theSerbiancoachVladimirJankovic(hereinafter:Claimantorcoach)andtheLithuanianclubVSJFKRiteriai(hereinafter:cluborRespondent)concludedanemploymentcontract(hereinafter:contract)validasfromthedateofsignatureuntil15November2023. 2.InaccordancewiththeContract,theRespondentundertooktopaytotheClaimantinteraliathefollowingamounts: -EUR6,612asmonthlysalary; -EUR1,158asmonthlyrentalallowance; -EUR500asanofficialmatchwinningbonus. 3.On21July2023,theRespondentsenttheClaimantacorrespondencetitled“OrderonimplementationoftheEmploymentContract”,accordingtowhichthelatterwasprohibitedfromattendingtrainingsessionsandcontinuingtocarryouthiscoachingactivityuntil23July2023. 4.On24July2023,theRespondentsentasecondcorrespondencetotheClaimanttitled“OrderonprovidingexplanationregardingallegedviolationofEmploymentduties”,inwhichanexplanationwasrequestedfromtheClaimantregardinganalleged“psychologicalcompulsionandunethicalbehaviourwithotherteammembers”. 5.Onthesameday,inreplytobothabovementionedcorrespondences,theClaimantprovidedaresponse,statingthefollowing: -Theaccusationsof“psychologicalcompulsionandunethicalbehaviour”are unfoundedandcompletelyuncorroborated; -ThefailuretopaytheClaimantoutstandingbonusesandthepreclusionfromconductingtrainingsessionsconstitutedaseverebreachofcontractbytheRespondent; -TheRespondentisformallyputindefaultofpaymentofEUR2,000asoutstandingremuneration,andgrantedadeadlineof15daystoremedytheallegedbreach; -RespondentshouldimmediatelyceasebreachingtheContractandallowtheClaimanttoresumehisactivityasheadcoach. 6.On25July2023,theRespondentunilaterallyterminatedtheContractdueto“seriousviolations”ofhisemploymentduties.TheRespondentspecifiedthatitsplayerscomplainedabouta“negative,psychologicallystressfulanddemotivatingatmosphere”withintheteam,forwhichtheClaimantwasallegedlyresponsible,andwhichconstitutedamaterialbreachofthecontractbytheClaimant,entitlingtheRespondenttoprematurelyterminatetheContractwithjustcause. 7.On26July2023,theRespondentpaidanamountofEUR5,342.58,correspondingtotheClaimant’spro-ratasalaryandrentalallowanceforthemonthofJulyuntilthedateoftermination. 8.On28July2023,theClaimantsentadefaultnoticetotheRespondent,requestingcompensationintheamountofEUR28,698.86plusinterestwithin15days,tonoavail. 9.ThecoachsignedacontractwithMontenegrinclubSutjeskaNiksic(hereinafter:theNewClub)validasfrom10August2023until31May2025(hereinafter:theNewContract). 10.InaccordancewiththeNewContract,theClaimantisentitledtoreceiveEUR450permonthassalary. II.ProceedingsbeforeFIFA 11.On1September2023,theClaimantfiledtheclaimathandbeforeFIFA.Abriefsummaryofthepositionofthepartiesisdetailedincontinuation. a.PositionoftheClaimant 12.Inhisclaim,theClaimantarguedthattheRespondentfabricatedallegationsof “psychologicalcompulsion”and“unethicalbehaviour”,providingnoevidencetothateffect. 13.TheClaimantfurtheroutlinedthattheRespondentonlymadereferencetoasignedletterbytheplayers,ofwhichheneverreceivedacopy,purportingthattheformerwasresponsiblefora“negative,psychologicallystressfulanddemotivatingatmosphere”inthedressingroom,whichwasinanycaseinsufficienttoterminatetheContractwithjustcause. 14.TheClaimantthusarguedthat,astheterminationoftheContractresultedwithoutjustcausebytheRespondent,compensationwasduetotheformer. 15.TheClaimantthereforerequestedcompensationofEUR28,698.86,aswellasinterestonsaidamountfrom26July2023. b.PositionoftheRespondent 16.Despitehavingbeeninvitedtodoso,theRespondentfailedtoprovideapositiontotheclaim. III.ConsiderationsofthePlayers’StatusChamber a.Competenceandapplicablelegalframework 17.Firstofall,theSingleJudgeofthePlayers’StatusChamber(hereinafteralsoreferredtoasSingleJudge)analysedwhetherhewascompetenttodealwiththecaseathand.Inthisrespect,hetooknotethatthepresentmatterwaspresentedtoFIFAon1September2023andsubmittedfordecisionon24October2023.Takingintoaccountthewordingofart.34oftheMarch2023editionoftheProceduralRulesGoverningtheFootballTribunal(hereinafter:theProceduralRules),theaforementionededitionoftheProceduralRulesisapplicabletothematterathand. 18.Subsequently,theSingleJudgereferredtoart.2par.1oftheProceduralRulesandobservedthatinaccordancewithart.23par.2incombinationwithart.22lit.c)oftheRegulationsontheStatusandTransferofPlayers(May2023edition),theSingleJudgeiscompetenttodealwiththematteratstake,whichconcernsanemployment-relateddisputewithaninternationaldimensionbetweenaSerbiancoachandaLithuanianclub. 19.Subsequently,theSingleJudgeanalysedwhichregulationsshouldbeapplicableastothesubstanceofthematter.Inthisrespect,heconfirmedthat,inaccordancewithart.26par.1and2oftheRegulationsontheStatusandTransferofPlayers(May2023edition),andconsideringthatthepresentclaimwaslodgedon1September2023,theMay2023editioneditionofsaidregulations(hereina

点击免费查看完整报告