热门搜索：

Tidiane Diallo

文化传媒2023-11-10FIFAB***

AI智能总结

The dispute resolution chamber passed a decision on November 10, 2023, regarding an employment-related dispute between Amadou Tidiane Diallo, a French player, and Clubul Sportiv Mioveni, a Romanian club. The contract between the two parties was valid from the date of signature until June 30, 2023. The club agreed to pay the player a monthly salary of EUR 4,800 net and a sign-on fee of EUR 4,500 net. The contract was governed by the Law of physical education and sports no. 69/2000, the Civil Code, the Regulation on the Status and Transfer of Football Players, the Law 227/2015 regarding the Fiscal Code, and the Regulations of FRF and FIFA. The dispute was resolved amicably, but if that failed, it would be resolved through litigation in the competent arbitration courts of sports, such as the competent committees of FRF and/or LPF, depending on the case, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (TAS).

Decisionofthe DisputeResolutionChamber passedon10November2023 regardinganemployment-relateddisputeconcerningtheplayerAmadouTidianeDiallo BY: AlexandraGomezBruinewoud,Uruguay&theNetherlands CLAIMANT: AmadouTidianeDiallo,France RepresentedbyDanielleBabin RESPONDENT: ClubulSportivMioveni,Romania RepresentedbyDiaconuSilviuConstantin I.Factsofthecase 1.On15January2023,theFrenchplayer,AmadouTidianeDiallo(hereinafter:theplayerortheClaimant),andtheRomanianclub,CSMioveni(hereinafter:theclubortheRespondent),concludedanemploymentcontractvalidasfromthedateofsignatureuntil30June2023(hereinafter:theContract). 2.Underclause4oftheContract,theclubundertooktopaytotheplayerthefollowingamounts: EUR4,800netasmonthlysalary;and EUR4,500netassign-onfee. 3.Clause11oftheContractreadsasfollows: “XI.APPLICABLELAW ThisAgreementwillbegovernedandinterpretedaccordingtotheLawofphysicaleducationandsportsno.69/2000,totheCivilCode,totheRegulationontheStatusandTransferofFootballPlayers,totheLaw227/2015regardingtheFiscalCodeandtotheRegulationsofFRFandFIFA. Theconflictsrelatedtotheexecution,performance,modification,suspensionorterminationofthisAgreementwillbesolvedinthefollowingorderofproceedings: amicably; aslitigations,consideringthatthecompetencetosolvesuchlitigationsbelongstothearbitrationcourtsofsports,thatisthecompetentcommitteesofFRFand/orLPF,dependingonthecase,andTAS,exceptingthosethatbelongexclusivelytothecompetenceofthecourtsoflaw,underthelaw.(FIFAFootbalTribunal(sic),pursuantRSTPofFIFAandAppealtoCAS)”. 4.On11May2023,theplayerputtheclubindefaultofpaymentofEUR14,100net,correspondingtohissign-onfeeandthesalariesfromMarchandApril2023undertheContract.Theplayergrantedthecluba15days’deadlineinordertoremedythebreachunderpenaltyofterminationinlinewithart.14bisoftheFIFARegulationsontheStatusandTransferofPlayers(RSTP). 5.On1June2023,andabsentanyreplyfromtheclub,theplayernotifieditoftheterminationoftheContractduetooverduepayables. 6.On14June2023,theclubsubmittedarequesttoopeninsolvencyproceedings(“preventiveconcordat”)beforethenationalcourtsinRomania. 7.On22June2023,theRomaniannationalcourtsadmittedtheclub’srequestforopeningofinsolvencyproceedingsandinteraliaappointedtheauthorizedadministrator(hereinafter:theAdministrator). 8.On7August2023,theAdministratorsubmittedarestructuringplanfortheclubandinteralia listedtheplayerascreditorofRON25,000. 9.TheplayerconfirmedthatheremainedunemployedfollowingtheterminationoftheContract. II.ProceedingsbeforeFIFA 10.On25September2023,theplayerfiledtheclaimathandbeforeFIFA.Abriefsummaryofthepositionofthepartiesisdetailedincontinuation. a.Positionoftheplayer 11.Inhisclaim,theplayerexplainedthatheterminatedtheContractwithjustcausebasedonart.14bisoftheFIFARSTP.Consequently,theplayerrequestedtobeawardedthetotalamountofEUR18,900net,brokendownasfollows: EUR4,500assign-onfeeplus5%interestasfrom31January2023; EUR4,800asthesalaryofApril2023plus5%interestasfrom30April2023; EUR4,800asthesalaryofMay2023plus5%interestasfrom31May2023;and EUR4,800asthesalaryofJune2023plus5%interestasfrom30June2023. b.Positionoftheclub 12.On22October2023,theclubfileditsreplytotheclaim. 13.Initsreply,theclubchallengedFIFA’sjurisdictionbasedonthefollowingreasons: Theclubisundergoingaspecificalprocedureofinsolvency(“preventiveconcordat”)underthenationallaw.Assuch,anyandallclaimsshouldbesuspendedandhandledexclusivelybytheRomaniancourts.Likewise,thecreditoftheplayerhadalreadybeenconsideredinrestructuringplanissuedbytheAdministrator,thereforepreventingthejurisdictionofFIFA;and ThepartiesincludedajurisdictionclausereferringtotheNationalDisputeResolutionChamberoftheRomanianFootballFederation(FRF)/ProfessionalFootballLeague(PFL)(hereinafter:theRomanianNDRC)andsuchbodycomplieswithFIFA’srequirementsoncomposition,independence,andfairproceedings. 14.Theclubfiledthefollowingrelief: “31.Aftertheexaminationofalltheevidenceandargumentsoftheparties,werespectfullyrequestthehonourableChamber: I.TheinadmissibilityoftheCoach’sclaim(sic),basedonart.22let.c)oftheRegulationsontheStatusandTransferofPlayers,forlackofjurisdictionoftheFIFAjurisdictionalbodiestosettlethisdisputeonthemerits. II.Insubsidiary,ifFIFAtribunalconsiderthatiscompetenttosettlethisdispute,pursuanttoarticle26oftheProceduralRulesGoverningtheFootballTribunal,wewouldliketorequestthemediationprocedurewhichisdeemedappropriateinthematterandtheClaimantisgoingtoreceivethefullamount,butwithin25monthsofinstalmentsaccordingtothereorganizationplanandthesettlementproposalsenttohimbythespecialadministratoroftheinsolvencyprocedure”. III.ConsiderationsoftheDisputeResolutionChamber a.Competenceandapplicablelegalframework 15.Firstofall,theSingleJudgeoftheDisputeResolutionChamber(hereinafteralsoreferredtoasSingleJudge)analysedwhethershewascompetenttodealwiththecaseathand.Inthisrespect,shetooknotethatthepresentmatterwaspresentedtoFIFAon25September2023andsubmittedfordecisionon13November2023.Takingintoaccountthewordingofart.34oftheMay2023editionoftheProceduralRulesGoverningtheFootballTribunal(h

点击免费查看完整报告