热门搜索：

Andras Ugrai

文化传媒2023-11-22FIFA徐***

AI智能总结

The FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC) has made a decision regarding an employment-related dispute between Roland Andras Ugrai, a Hungarian player, and Pendikspor Futbol A.Ş., a Turkish club. The DRC ruled that the club must pay Ugrai a bonus of 50,000 euros for promoting to the Super League at the end of the season. The bonus payment was to be made within 30 days of the league's registration, pro-rated based on the number of official league matches played by Ugrai. Ugrai terminated the contract on February 2, 2023, and filed a claim with the FIFA DRC on March 20, 2023, for outstanding remuneration and compensation for breach of contract without just cause. The DRC granted Ugrai the requested compensation on July 10, 2023.

Decisionofthe DisputeResolutionChamber passedon22November2023 regardinganemployment-relateddisputeconcerningtheplayerRolandAndrasUgrai COMPOSITION: FransDEWEGER(TheNetherlands),ChairpersonJohanVANGAALEN(SouthAfrica),memberCalumBEATTIE(Scotland),member CLAIMANT: RolandAndrasUgrai,Hungary RepresentedbyKristofWenczel RESPONDENT: PendiksporFutbolA.Ş.,Türkiye I.Factsofthecase 1.On9August2022,theHungarianplayerRolandAndrasUgrai(hereinafter:theClaimantortheplayer)andtheTurkishclubPendiksporFutbolA.Ş.(hereinafter:theRespondentortheclub)concludedanemploymentcontract(hereinafter:theContract)validuntil31May2023andanadditionalprotocol(hereinafter:theAdditionalProtocol). 2.AccordingtotheAdditionalProtocol: “IftheClubpromotestotheSuperLeagueattheendoftheseasontheClubwillpay50.000,-EURObonustothePlayer.Thebonuspaymentswillbemadewithin30daysfromtheregistrationoftheleaguesiftherelevantconditionismet.Thebonuspaymentwillbecalculatedandmadeaccordingthepro-rataprincipleconsideringthenumberoftheofficialleaguematchesthattheplayerhasplayed.” 3.On2February2023,theClaimantterminatedtheContractadducingjustcause. 4.On20March2023,theClaimantfiledaclaimbeforetheFIFADRCwithreferencenumberFPSD-9672(hereinafter:theFirstClaim). 5.On10July2023,theFIFADRCpassedadecisionintheFirstClaimgrantingtheClaimantoutstandingremunerationandcompensationforbreachofcontractwithoutjustcause. 6.On10August2023,theClaimantsentadefaultnoticetotheRespondentrequestingthepaymentofEUR4,000within8days. II.ProceedingsbeforeFIFA 7.On29September2023,theClaimantfiledtheclaimathandbeforeFIFA.Abriefsummaryofthepositionofthepartiesisdetailedincontinuation. a.PositionoftheClaimant 8.TheClaimantstatesthatheplayed”3gamesoutof37gamesinthewholeseasonwhichequalsto8%percenttotheoverallgames.Ifthebonuspaymentiscalculatedprorata,thePlayerisentitledto €4.000,-whichequalsto8%tothewholeamountofthebonuspayment”. 9.TheClaimantunderlinesthattheamountclaimedwasnotdue20March2023whenitfiledtheFirstClaim. 10.TheClaimantrequests: PleaseobligetheClubtoadditionallypayEUR4,000tothePlayerandconsequentlydecideonthebonuspaymentinfavourofhiminaccordancewithpoint3(requestforrelief)ofthestatementofclaimsubmittedbythePlayeron20March2023asitwasrequestedasfollows: “ClaimantdeclaresthatincaseoftheClub’spromotiontotheTurkishFirstLeagueattheendoftheseason2022/23theclaimistobeextendedforthebonusesaccordingly”. wealsorequesttoobligetheRespondenttopay5%p.a.latepaymentinterestrateafterthebonuspaymentfromthedateoftheregistrationoftheClubtotheTurkishSuperLeagueuntiltheeffectivepaymentdateoftherequestabove. b.PositionoftheRespondent 11.Initsreply,theRespondentstatesthatithaspaidalltheamountsduetotheClaimantinrelationtotheFirstClaim. 12.TheRespondentstatesthat“thePlayerisstillactinginbadfaithandunfairlydemandingadditionalpayments.Therefore,thebadfaithandunfairlydemandingofthePlayershouldberejected.Withthisrequest,ThePlayeristryingtoobtainunlawfulprofitfromourClub”. 13.TheClaimantfiledthefollowingrequests: 6.1ThereasonsexplainedabovewekindlyrequestyoutodecidejudgmentofdismissalaboutthepresentcaseandtherejectionofallrequestsoftheClaimantPlayer 6.2.WewouldliketorequestyourhonorablechambertomakeadecisionthatthejudicialcostsandtheattorneyshipfeesthattheRespondentisfacedwithshallbepaidbytheClaimant.Ifnot,toawardaminimumamountofproceduralcostinconnectionwiththetemporaryamendmenttotheProceduralRulesdeclaredwiththeCircular1720. III.ConsiderationsoftheDisputeResolutionChamber a.Competenceandapplicablelegalframework 14.Firstofall,theDisputeResolutionChamber(hereinafteralsoreferredtoas“theDRC”or“theChamber”)analysedwhetheritwascompetenttodealwiththecaseathand.Inthisrespect,ittooknotethatthepresentmatterwaspresentedtoFIFAon29September2023andsubmittedfordecisionon22November2023.Takingintoaccountthewordingofart.34oftheMarch2023editionoftheProceduralRulesGoverningtheFootballTribunal(hereinafter:theProceduralRules),theaforementionededitionoftheProceduralRulesisapplicabletothematterathand. 15.Subsequently,theChamberreferredtoart.2par.1andart.24par.1lit.a)oftheProceduralRulesandobservedthatinaccordancewithart.23par.1incombinationwithart.22par.1lit.b)oftheRegulationsontheStatusandTransferofPlayers(May2023),itiscompetenttodealwiththematteratstake,whichconcernsanemployment-relateddisputewithaninternationaldimensionbetweenaHungarianplayerandaTurkishclub. 16.Subsequently,theChamberanalysedwhichregulationsshouldbeapplicableastothesubstanceofthematter.Inthisrespect,itconfirmedthat,inaccordancewithart.26par.1and2oftheRegulationsontheStatusandTransferofPlayers(May2023edition)andconsideringthatthepresentclaimwaslodgedon29September2023,theMay2023editionofsaidregulations(hereinafter:theRegulations)isapplicabletothematterathandastothesubstance. b.Burdenofproof 17.TheChamberrecalledthebasicprincipleofburdenofproof,asstipulatedinart.13par.5oftheProceduralRules,accordingtowhichapartyclaimingarightonthebasisofanallegedfactshallcarrytherespectiveburdenofproof. c.Meritsofthedispute 18.Itscompetenceandtheapplicableregulationshavingbeenesta

点击免费查看完整报告